Facebook has said it will invest around US$1 billion in news around the world over the next three years Photo: AFP/File

Facebook to restore Australia news pages after deal on media law

By Andrew BEATTY

Facebook said Tuesday it will lift a contentious ban on Australian news pages, after the government agreed to amend a world-first law requiring tech giants to pay media companies.

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg and Facebook said a compromise had been reached on key aspects of the law, which was fiercely opposed by the tech companies.

"As a result of these changes, we can now work to further our investment in public interest journalism, and restore news on Facebook for Australians in the coming days," said Will Easton, managing director of Facebook Australia.

The social media firm sparked global outrage last week by blacking out news for its Australian users and inadvertently blocking a series of non-news Facebook pages linked to everything from cancer charities to emergency response services.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison had angrily accused Facebook of making a decision to "unfriend" Australia.

But the last minute compromise -- as parliament looks set to pass the law this week -- means that Facebook and Google, which was also targeted, will not be penalized so long as they reach some deals with local media firms to pay for news.

They will also get an additional two months to broker those agreements.

"We're pleased that we've been able to reach an agreement with the Australian government and appreciate the constructive discussions we've had" said Easton.

The tech firms had fiercely opposed the legislation from the get-go, fearing it would create international precedent that would threaten their business models.

"There is no doubt that Australia has been a proxy battle for the world," said Frydenberg.

In particular, the companies objected to rules that made negotiations with media companies mandatory and gave an independent Australian arbiter the right to impose a settlement.

Google was keen to avoid creating a precedent that platforms should pay anyone for links, something they could make their flagship search engine unworkable.

Facebook -- which is much less reliant on news content -- had said being forced to pay for news was simply not worth it.

"We have come to an agreement that will allow us to support the publishers we choose to, including small and local publishers," said Facebook vice president for global news partnerships Campbell Brown.

Despite earlier threats to pull its services from Australia over the legislation, Google had already softened its stance and brokered deals worth millions of dollars with a host of local media companies, including the two largest: Rupert Murdoch's News Corp and Nine Entertainment.

Facebook and Google still face the prospect of having to agree deals with media around the world, as the European Union, Canada and other jurisdictions move to regulate the sector.

Since their emergence around the turn of the century, Google and Facebook have been largely unregulated and have grown into two of the world's largest and most profitable companies.

But a string of scandals about misinformation, privacy violations, data harvesting and their virtual monopoly on online advertising has triggered the attention of watchdogs.

For every $100 spent by Australian advertisers today, $49 goes to Google and $24 to Facebook, according to the country's competition watchdog.

Critics of the law have said it is punishing successful companies and amounts to a money grab by struggling but politically connected traditional media.

They also lament that there is no requirement in the law that money gained by the media companies from Facebook and Google be spent on expanding public interest journalism rather than just boost profits.

Thousands of journalism jobs and scores of news outlets have been lost in Australia alone over the past decade as the sector watched advertising revenue flow to the digital players.

© 2021 AFP

©2021 GPlusMedia Inc.

Login to comment

Who gets their news from Facebook?

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Too bad. My Aussie friends said it was nice having a cleaner news feed.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

The digital platforms and news publishers couldn't afford the loss of revenue

0 ( +0 / -0 )

At least AFP did a better job at pointing out that this new law doesn't help or cover small independent news and publishers.

In fact they were left out of the law which is a Rupert Murdoch backed law.

This was specifically written to benefit larger mainstream media and block small independent News from having any say, any contracts and access to FB users.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

AntiquesavingToday  11:45 am JST

This was specifically written to benefit larger mainstream media and block small independent News from having any say, any contracts and access to FB users.

More and more people are shunning mainstream media for independent news anyway. Those who are doing so have already developed a finely tuned 'BS meter' and aren't Facebook's core users. The point is that "having access to Facebook users" isn't such a blow to independent media as the outflux of switched-on, critically thinking people (from Facebook etc) is to the social media publishers.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

More and more people are shunning mainstream media for independent news anyway.

Which has directly led to a lot of the problems in America - so many of these "independent news sources" have no jounalistic integrity, but they sell sensationalist fear, something the right is particularly prone to.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Facebook: Gangster capitalism at work. As for news feeds: the employed algorithms block genuine journalists who have been shunted to the margins. Though weirdo bloggers and nonsense that doesn't even aspire to the level of a tabloid appear regularly. Facebook is a data mining venture, incredibly intrusive and warrants regulation due to monopoly status. Facebook has a very large, detrimental effect on the practice of actual journalism and its proliferation. Same with Google.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

platforms should pay anyone for links

Lol, links is how the entire Internet works.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

warrants regulation due to monopoly status

Not sure that is true... Facebook doesn’t seem to have a monopoly because many people have been quitting it. I personally rarely ever use it.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I don’t understand what was this blunder from Facebook about. Usually companies think well in advance and don’t mess with any government. Is it just to make their shares price jump back and force for someone from the management to buy a pair of new trousers?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Analysts say Facebook got the better of the Australian government in this deal

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Analysts say Facebook got the better of the Australian government in this deal

I'm inclined to agree. Australia had a big chance here, and they fouled it up. Which is unsurprising for the Morrison government. They are all about big business over the little guy. In this case it was the government negotiating for one big business against another.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites